<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: my LWE podcast contest submishio</title>
	<link>http://www.deejaycountzero.com/blog/?p=101</link>
	<description>All Purpose Beats Since 1996</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 00:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Count Zero</title>
		<link>http://www.deejaycountzero.com/blog/?p=101#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 01:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deejaycountzero.com/blog/?p=101#comment-203</guid>
		<description>by the way, just realized i don't link to you in my blogroll.  fixing that tout suite as i'm a regular reader of random circuits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way, just realized i don&#8217;t link to you in my blogroll.  fixing that tout suite as i&#8217;m a regular reader of random circuits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Zero</title>
		<link>http://www.deejaycountzero.com/blog/?p=101#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 01:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deejaycountzero.com/blog/?p=101#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reading and glad you're enjoying.  The winner's mix is quite good, really, I just am quite proud of mine and would have posted it here regardless.  I guess my point was that I kind of understand why they didn't choose mine given that "for home listening" criterion.  What's irritating is that they didn't specify that in the rules.  I easily could have tailored my mix for the listening ear, not the dancing feet.  Really, though, I am happy just to have had the chance to participate.  Ya know?  It motivated me to do something outside of what I'd normally do, and to constrain myself to a time limit and the other rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading and glad you&#8217;re enjoying.  The winner&#8217;s mix is quite good, really, I just am quite proud of mine and would have posted it here regardless.  I guess my point was that I kind of understand why they didn&#8217;t choose mine given that &#8220;for home listening&#8221; criterion.  What&#8217;s irritating is that they didn&#8217;t specify that in the rules.  I easily could have tailored my mix for the listening ear, not the dancing feet.  Really, though, I am happy just to have had the chance to participate.  Ya know?  It motivated me to do something outside of what I&#8217;d normally do, and to constrain myself to a time limit and the other rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.deejaycountzero.com/blog/?p=101#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 00:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.deejaycountzero.com/blog/?p=101#comment-201</guid>
		<description>great mix. "better suited for the dance floor than home listening" is this a bad thing? i dont think so. i've not listened to the winners mix but i'm really enjoying yours.thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great mix. &#8220;better suited for the dance floor than home listening&#8221; is this a bad thing? i dont think so. i&#8217;ve not listened to the winners mix but i&#8217;m really enjoying yours.thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
